Yuku free message boards

Quote:

---

We should take a lesson on sexuality from Europe.

---

Yes, let's legalize child pornography, put porn on public TV and teach sex ed in the second grade. That will surely make everything better!

Well, here's the "great link" and commonality.

First off, the female breast.

With regard to sexuality and human behavior, the difference between the female breast, and the male breast is that the female breast is usually quite a bit larger, and rounder, and biologically is meant to attract the male of the species.

With animals, it might be a mating call. It might be a pheremone, their butt might light up like a christmas tree.. it might be a particular arrangement of feathers, or a certain walk, or any combination of the above. Each species has a version of "sexy", and for we humans, boobs are in that category.

Why do guys check out girl's butts? It's not like guys dont have their own butts.. and what's more, they're pretty much the same as a woman's butt.. two lumps that you sit on. There isn't really a good explaination, but one thing is true: guys like girl's butts.

So then, we all have boobs (either male or female variety), we all have butts, and we all have genitals (either male or female variety). Aside from the elements, why then do we even wear clothing at all?

Would it have been more or less offensive if Justin Timberlake had pulled off a secret crotch panel on Janet's outfit? It's just body parts, right?

So, now let's begin the link from Nudity, to porn, to sex, to freaky sex.

Guys like to see girls naked. Why? Because it sexually excites them, and as you know there are no end to religious rules and commandments regarding sexual acts and thoughts. To put it simply, Public Nudity is wrong, at least according to 72% of people in that survey.

Now folks like redlow and yourself come along, and attempt to rationalize why Public Nudity shouldn't be wrong, with arguments like "it just expresses milk, what's the big deal?". What you've done here is thrown out the "moral" part of the equation.. again, in our society, the moral is coming from the Christian religion.

Well, if we're going to throw out the moral to the equation, then we must throw out the morals on every situation. What then, would a moral-less society be like?

Why is murder wrong?
Why is stealing wrong?
Why is child pornography wrong?
Why is beastiality wrong?

In a world with no morals, nothing is wrong, and everything is right.

So then, I can only assume that we're talking about some moral code, other than that which our society generally accepts. If we're going that route, then we need to come up with reasons why this new code is different.

Let's compare pedophilia and premarital sex.. why is one okay, and the other not okay in this moral code?

What about Beastiality? What makes it "wrong" in this moral code? What makes incest "wrong"?

In Example, if you believe in the sanctity of love be it between man and woman, or between man and man, or woman and woman.. then what is wrong with love between brother and sister, man and dog, or man and child?

Does love "know no bounds", or does it know bounds, but where those bounds are is inconsistant?

This isn't anything that Christians haven't been asked over the years, and let's face it, their resposes are sometimes no more logical than they are consistant.

So, why are all these things linked together sometimes in posts? It's not that "all homosexuals are pedophiles" or "exposed breasts leads to beastiality" it's because all of these things are considered "wrong" for identical reasons. If you change the reason for one, and make it right, then you have to change the reason for all of them to make it all right.